Available on DVD

HOME

This Is A Bio-Attack Alert, March 28, 1986

This results from an attempt by myself and my brother to form an Health Maintenance Organization. I had difficulty estimating the probable cost of the "Human Retroviruses" as related to premium costs and was led deeper and deeper into the literature of virology attempting to solve the problem.

At first I considered testing and allowing individuals infected with the AIDS virus to form a special group, associate, insure, and have sexual relations. The literature reveals that plan will not work because the greater number of times one is infected with "Human Retroviruses" the more quickly one dies. There is a critical mass of infection which leads to reinfection of associating individuals and accelerated death. (l), I abandoned that plan.

When I considered the possibility of testing and allowing uninfected individuals to form a special group, associate, insure, and have sexual relations, I stumbled into a written order for the AIDS virus and a written plan to inject disease during preventive vaccinations for experimental purposes. I then realized the importance of the critical mass of infection. Once sufficient numbers of Americans are infected, because AIDS is not only a sexually transmissible disease, (1,2) even without sexual intercourse, the infected will reinfect each other, and the uninfected will become infected leading to an explosion of infection and disease.

Apparently, individuals in the United States National Institute of Health and National Cancer Institute have combined with the United Nation's World Health Organization to attack the United States with Bio-Weapons. (6-8):

The explosion of induced disease now rumbles through Africa.(5) The intentional introduction of disease began in Africa where sibships were inoculated by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (8) with diseases obtained from the United States National Institute of Health's New Bolton Center (NBC) cell lines or diseases previously inoculated were mixed by IARC's unsterile procedures. (5 6- 8 ,l7,27,3 2,33,,35 letters and replies enclosed) other diseases were probably inoculated from other available cell cultures at other locations. In American homosexuals the virus may have been engineered to reproduce faster and for specific attack. (3,9,39)

As usual, this warning arrives after the attack is underway. I hope that I am wrong. If I am correct, I send this warning 16 years late.

Review of recent history and science publications leads me to the conclusion that I am correct. Therefore, I send this warning to the President of the United States, the Vice-President of the United States, Governors of the several states and various federal government agencies including the Departments of State, Defense, Agriculture, NSA, FBI and CIA, and three selected members of the United States.

Congress whom I ask deliver this to members of Congress as they deem appropriate.

I did not realize that the National Cancer Attack Act of 1971 would be used to research virus warfare, finance virus warfare and attack the United States of America. Daniel Greenberg outlines the attack's beginning in Discover, March, 1986, at page 47 in an article, "Whatever Happened to the War on Cancer. " (4)

He recalls that in 1971 President Nixon sought to preclude Senator Kennedy from running for president by cornering the health car e field among other methods. He fails to mention that Stuart A. Aaronson had just announced that he had altered mouse RNA tumor viruses to extend their range and to replicate efficiently in humans by culturing the tumor virus in human cells.(3) Ann Landers, using her newspaper column, helped persuade the Senate to appropriate the funds for the National Cancer Attack Act of 1971. This Act resulted in NCI Director Baker's removal. Frank R. Rauscher, a virologist, was appointed head of the NCI. (4)

I am sure that the United States Congress as then constituted, except for those members with allegiance to foreign governments, did not comprehend that their legislation would result in a Bio-Attack on the United States from the World Health Organization assisted by some individuals in the United States National Institute of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Department of Agriculture, and at various colleges and universities; all paid for by United States tax monies. Yet, that is exactly what is happening.

How, you wonder, does the disease AIDS of today, purportedly homosexual, evidence an attack on the United States by the world's virologists and bureaucrats? In documents available in medical libraries virologists and bureaucrats request the production of the AIDS virus and plan its introduction to various populations of the world during preventive vaccinations.

THE PLAN

In Volume 47 of the Bulletin of The World Health Organization, pages 257 through 274 (1972) , we find A. C. Allison with others including WHO officials and an NIH bureaucrat recommend at page 259:(6)

(1) A systematic evaluation of the effects of viruses on Immune functions should be undertaken. A number of viruses should be studied and a standard set of immune functions should be employed. Among the factors that deserve investigation are antigen types (e.g., thymus-dependant vs. non-thymus dependant), antigen dose, and the time relationship between infection and antigen administration.

(2) The effects of virus infection on different cell types (e.g., macrophages, T and B lymphocytes) should be studied in greater detail with morphological changes perhaps serving as an indication of functional alteration. Since differences in terminology often make it difficult to assess reports of pathological changes in lymphoid tissue, all modifications of the lymphoid organs should be described according to standardized criteria. Efforts at standardization are currently being supported by the World Health Organization. 

(3): An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function, e.g., by depressing 7S vs 19S antibody, or, by affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function (Allison et.. al., 1972). The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens.

Thus, AIDS today is the disease the possibility of which was "to be looked into" in 1972, because in AIDS the immune response to the virus is impaired when a portion of the cells responding to the viral antigens are the infected cells which are killed, "lysed" in virologists terms, by the viral antigen. (38)LET THERE BE NO QUESTION THAT INFECTION WAS INTENDED BECAUSE A PART OF THE STUDY WAS TO BE THE TIME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFECTION AND ANTIGEN ADMINISTRATION.

How was the study to be conducted in humans? The Fogerty International Center Proceedings No. 15 published in Federation Proceedings, Vol. 31, No. 3, May-June 1972, reports the proceedings of a workshop held at the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, July 27-30, 1970. (7) The committee for the conference was sponsored by the John E. Fogerty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences and the World Health Organization. At that conference in a Histocompatibility workshop, D. B. Amos of Duke University with other allegedly independent scientists and bureaucrats, who in fact were and are dependent upon United States Government grants to further their research, suggested at page 1102:

"In relation to the immune response, a number of useful experimental approaches can be visualized. One would be a study of the relationship of  HL-A type to the immune response, both humoral and cellular, to well defined bacteria and viral antigens during preventive vaccinations. This approach would be particularly informative when applied to sibships."

I assume by "well defined" they meant well known. I further assume that by "sibships" they  meant children of the same parents.

Therefore, it is clear that WHO and the NIH decided in 1970 to inject known virus and bacteria into children of the same parents during allegedly preventive vaccinations to study HL-A type. Then in 1972, the WHO Bulletin changed the study to a study of virus which cause a depression in immune function. I repeat, LET THERE BE NO QUESTION THAT INFECTION WAS INTENDED BECAUSE A PART OF THE STUDY WAS TO BE THE TIME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFECTION AND ANTIGEN ADMINISTRATION.

All their planning would be worthless without willing bodies to do the work. The evidence of the bodies is provided by the Seventh National Cancer Conference Proceedings, sponsored by the American Cancer Society, Inc., and the United States National Cancer Institute, published by the J. B. Lippencott Company, Philadelphia and Toronto 1972. (8) It contains the report on epidemiology by John Higginson, M.D., director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, and a map on page 681 indicating the world wide distribution of that agency's programs. It is important that we remember that the date of the map is 1972, as we read the words of Doctor Higginson at page 680:
 

"......The complex biology of cancer makes it essential to approach observational studies in man with the same technical sophistication that characterizes animal experimentation. Thus, the Governing and Scientific Councils decided that the Agency's epidemiological studies should be fully integrated with recent developments in laboratory research and that a multidisciplinary team approach was essential to insure that the Agency would make full use of its unique international situation. The mere collection of numerical data --"nose-counting"-- is of no value per se, and descriptive epidemiology is only one of many disciplines concerned in the study of cancer causation. (Emphasis added)

Of course, descriptive epidemiology is merely the collection and analysis of numerical data. On the other hand the "technical sophistication that characterizes animal experimentation" involves the inoculation of disease into the research animals.

All we need to do to see the relationship between the "Governing and Scientific Councils," inoculation of disease, the AIDS virus, and its related Retroviruses is pincil in the homosexual cohorts from the Hepatitis B vaccine study reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 97, No. 3, (1982) pages 362-369, (31) on the map on page 681 of the Seventh National Conference Proceedings, (8) and we have marked the Retroviruses concentrations of the world as now known. The St. Louis and Chicago cohorts of the Hepatitis B Studies may have served as controls or got a dose of a slower acting cancer inducer like HTLV-I or HTLV-II. Robert C. Gallo and Flossie Wong-Stall reproduced the map for us at page 396 of their attack, "Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses", Nature, Vol. 317, October 3, 1985. (32) (maps enclosed)

THE CONFUSION OF TODAY

Writing in LANCET, January 11, 1986, (5) Doctor Robert J. Biggarof the United States National Institute of Health said:

"....The AIDS agent, a complicated Retroviruses with core proteins and a glycoprotein envelope, could not have originated de novo. The identification of the progenitor agent from which this agent either mutated or recombined has significant implications. First, the ancestor agent has not yet been identified. Its pattern of disease associations in man may differ from that of HTLV-III/LAV.... Secondly, the non-pathogenic progenitor could be a safe source of immunizing material if there is any neutralizing cross-reactivity between the two agents. (5) 

I agree. I suggest: 

(1) The World Health organization asked for the AIDS virus HTLV-III/LAV/ARV) and it was supplied; (6-8)

(2) The AIDS virus is Bovine Visna Virus (BVV) in man with a transacting transcriptional regulator gene inherited from Bovine Leukemia Virus; (3 9-13 20,21,24) 

(3) HTLV-II is bovine syncytial virus (BSV): in man; (14-17,24) 

(4) HTLV-I is bovine leukemia virus (BLV), in  man, is highly contagious, is vector borne, and is fomite born.(18-20,22,24)

I have also suggested that unless the United States National Institute of Health has taken the advice of Dr. Jacques Leibowitch given on page 97 of the English translation his book, A Strange Virus of Unknown Origin (27), and had them stolen or changed., Dr. Biggar should request the cell lines NBC-1 through NBC-13. He will most likely find the progenitor he seeks in NBC-6, NBC-8, NBC-10, or NBC-13 . (2 8,29) He should start with NBC-13.

It would also be interesting to know what is in NBC-14 to NBC-17 and whether or not any of them were injected anywhere. In other words I suggest Dr. Biggar go down into his basement at work and get the progenitor he seeks. 

GIVEN THE REACTION OF THE MEDICAL JOURNALS TO WHICH THESE SUGGESTIONS WERE SUBMITTED, I MAY BE CORRECT IN MY IDENTIFICATION OF THE AGENTS INVOLVED. I enclose copies of my letters and the journals' replies. HOWEVER, I SUGGEST TO YOU THAT MY IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROGENITOR IS UNNECESSARY BECAUSE THE AIDS VIRUS ITSELF REPRESENTS THE FRUITION OF THE MURDER PLAN OUTLINED ABOVE.

THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ATTACK

The purpose of the attack may be to prepare America by infection with immune depressing virus for a fast bio-attack. If that is true, it was started in the homosexuals in America because the enemy correctly judged that most Americans would not be alarmed by a homosexual disease. I wasn't alarmed by the "Homosexual" disease until I started my virology literature search. The disease will inexorably spread to the heterosexual population. The lies of the United States National Institute of Health in this regard reveal its Participation in the attack. AIDS is not merely a homosexual disease and the NIH knows it.

In war the objective of each contesting side is to inflict death and wounds upon the other. The method chosen by the enemy will preserve American land and structures for the victors. Their action is calculated to demonstrate that right lies in their might, and freedom, impossible. 

The enemy hopes to impose despotic rule by the few and cry of the population to abandon the rights of others including the infected to save themselves. This is an attempt to exhaust America with hatred, struggle, want, confusion, and inoculation of disease. The enemy intends to control our population with disease, make us dependent upon their remedies, engineer each birth, and reduce America to a servant of the Supreme Soviet. All this, even though America has repeatedly abandon any attempt at world domination when such was easily within its power. It is not, repeat not, too late to thwart this plan.

THE BATTLE STATUS 

This is being fought slowly. Few know that it is going on. Does D. Carlton Gajdusek, now chief of the National Institute of Health's laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies and Labatory of Slow, Latent and Temperate Virus Infections know? At page 106 of Omni, March, 1986, (34) in response to the question, "Isn't Fort Detrick in Maryland such a Biological-Warfare Research Facility", he answers:

"No, emphatically no! There is no defensive or offensive warfare microbiology done at Fort Detrick today. It is the national cancer research facility of NIH. In this facility I have a building where more good and loyal Communist scientists from the USSR and laboratories than Americans. With bright working U.S. citizens and foreign Communist investigators here, obviously there is no "secret" bacterial warfare activity going on. Even the Army's infectious-disease unit is loaded with foreign workers not always friendly nationals. It is a valid basic research unit on worldwide problems of infectious diseases in which no classified or secret activities unfold....."

Of course, there are no secret activities unfolding. They, the virologists of WHO, NCI, and the NIH, have written in plain english their plan for conquest of America and are presently executing it disguised as cancer research.

Gentleman, we are under attack. We must act. If Dr. Gajdusek is correct, only a few loyal Communist scientists will be required to conclude the enemy's assault. Obviously, this might be done by contamination of American scientists experiments or despoiling vaccine cultures. At present only an estimated 2 million Americans are infected. We can deal with that amount, but, we must halt these induced diseases' spread. We are losing population to the AIDS virus at a rate of 2000 per week infected all of which will die prematurely.

The traitors have destroyed 14 years of virus research by lying in their research papers and inoculating subjects. Yet, we allow the enemy abide on these shores.

Read Ralph Kinney Bennett' characterization of the United Nations. He claims the U.N. has become:

An organization that sanctions the violent overthrow of sovereign governments; 

One of the Soviet Union's most important espionage posts in the West;

A political base, a source of funds and a propaganda organ for terrorist organizations;

The advocate of a new "World Order" amounting to global socialism;

A forum for anti-American, anti-Western, anti-free-enterprise activity. (30)

He is correct. We have allowed the United Nations World Health Organization to combine with traitors in the United States National Institute of Health to start a Soviet Union attack.
 

The Correct Response

America has always been poised between the pit of anarchy and the abyss of despotic rule. We are delicately balanced on the ledge of liberty.

Our response must be calculated to maintain liberty, avoid the plunge into the chasms on either side. and demonstrate to those who would rob us of liberty, in this case the virologists of the WHO, NCI, and the NIH, the army of the Soviet Union acting through the United Nations, that the tree of liberty must from time to time be watered with the blood of tyrants. It has already been fertilized with the blood of patriots.

Unknowing Africans, (sibships inoculated) hemophiliacs, (contaminated blood transfusions) southern poor, (free shots) homosexuals, (Hepatitis B inoculations) and unwarned heterosexuals trusted and died. You are next. Those groups were selected for initial attack because the enemy hoped no one would attempt to defend until it was too late. We must:

1. Retake the virus labs using force as necessary. The Army might be used in this action. Note that some of the labs will be at colleges and universities. Substitute virologists who have not been initiated into the ranks of the murderers.

2. Mobilize national guard to prepare quarentine hospitals and hospices for the infected individuals. Note that some of these institutions must be quite large. We need not leave our wounded in the field.

3. Inform the American people that the nation has been attacked and the enemy is ashore and advancing. Inform all scientists concerning the true nature of the disease and its origin. Someone may have a cure.

5. Seize all the records in the CDC and NIH of the inoculation projects. We will need them for the prosecutions. Attach the U.N. building and all U.N. funds including IARC's
 

6. Try the culpable individuals. But, note that some scientists will have been confused and tricked by the Governing and Scientific councils. We will have to sort carefully.

7. Alert remaining doctors to be on guard against other ordered diseases. See 47 WHO Bull. Organize for quarantine. Hopefully, quarantine won't be needed, but, we must act quickly.

8. Be on guard against vaccination projects. Merck is the company that made the Hepatitis vaccine that went into the American homosexual cohorts. AIDS is not progressing quickly enough to-satisfy the murderers or to hide their plan.

As Slaff and Brubaker say in their book, -T-b-I., Aids Epidemic, (35) at page 83:

.... a sexually transmitted disease needs a "portal of entry" in order to affect a group. For example, if half a dozen promiscuous students returned to a college campus carrying the virus in the fall, the virus would have achieved a "portal of entry" to that campus.

If the AIDS virus was injected into the students in a measles vaccination project or by a mosquito in Daytona Beach, Florida, the result would be the same. When I checked-the measles vaccination project at the University of Arkansas, they were using Merck's vaccine; Halt all vaccination projects until the vaccine is cleared.

We must also consider the following:

9. Prepare for the premature death of 100% of those infected with the AIDS virus.

10. The enemy wants us to abandon our wounded, abandon liberty, abandon due process of law, and submit to their despotic rule while they cull and kill. That is the only way that these diseases have been controlled in bovines. If we wait much longer, we all will be infected and reinfection each other. That is the enemy's goal. There are presently drugs which may inhibit the progress of these diseases and the NIH may be hiding them. (36,37) We need not fear the enemy. We shall cull the enemy from our midst and deal with these murders as provided by law. We need not live enslaved in chains of tyranny. Neither need we leave our children to these bastards' tender mercies. AIDS is not a homosexual disease and the NIH knows it.

We need to act in concert:

All that 14 years of research has done is institutionalize fraud and murder as national policy, move disease from cows to men, and speed the Soviet Union toward its goal of world domination. We are far from any cancer cure other than hype reported to the community.

Very truly yours,

Theodore A. Strecker

334 North Central Ave. Suite 101

Glendale CA 91203 USA

818-500-1332

 

REFERENCES

1. Goedert JJ. Biggar RJ. Weiss SH. et al. Three-Year Incidence of AIDS in Five Cohorts of HTLV-III--Infected Risk Group Members. Science 1986; 231:992-5.

2. Barre-Sinoussi F. Nugeyre MT. Chermann JC. Resistance of AIDS Virus at Room Temperature. Lancet 1985; iii:721-2. (Sept. 28, 1985)

3. Aaronson SA. Common Genetic Alterations of RNA Tumor Viruses grown in Human Cells. Nature 1971; 230:445-7.

4. Greenberg DS. Whatever Happened to the War on Cancer? Discover 1986; March:47. (The answer is that it turned Bovine Visna Virus into AIDS and an attack from. the United Nations operating through WHO on the United States.)

5. Biggar RJ. The Aids Problem In Africa. Lancet 1986; i: 79-83 at 81.

6. Allison AC. Beveridge WIB. Cockburn WC. et al. Virus-Associated immunopathology: Animal models and Implications for Human Disease. Bull WHO 1972; 47:257-63 at 259.

7. Amos DB. Bodmer WF. Ceppelini R. et al. Biological Significance of Histocompatibility Antigens. Fogerty International Center Proceedings No. 15. Fed Proc 1972; 31:1087-1104 at 1102. 

8. Higginson J. The Epidemiological Program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. In: Seventh National Cancer Conference Proceedings. Los Angeles: American Cancer Society, Inc. and National Cancer Institute. 1972:679-684. (Note the map on page 681 as it relates to the epidemiology of AIDS in reference No.'s 32 and 33.)

9. Georgiades JA. Billiau A. Vanderschueren B. Infection of Human Cell Cultures with Bovine Visna Virus. J Gen Vir 1978;38:375-81

10. Van Der Matten MJ. Booth AD. Seger CL. Isolation of a Virus From Cattle With Persistent Lymphocytosis. JNCI 1972; 49:1649-57.

11. Booth AD. Van Der Matten MJ. Ultrastructural Studies of a Visna-Like Syncytia-Producing virus from Cattle with Lymphocytosis. J
Vir 1974; 13:197-204.

12. Van Der Matten MJ. Miller JM. Booth AD. Replicating Type-C Virus Particles in Monolayer Cell Cultures of Tissues From Cattle With Lymphosaarcoma. JNCI 1974; 52:491-4.

13. Dodds JA. Hamilton RI. Structural Interactions Between Viruses as a Consequence of Mixed Infections. In: Advances in VIRUS RESEARCH. ed Lauffer MA. Bang FB. Maramorosch K. Smith KM. New York: Academic Press,  1976:33-86. (vol 20);

14. Malmquist WA. Van Der Matten MJ. Booth AD. et al. Isolation, Immunodif fusion, Immunofluorescence, and Electron Microscopy of a Syncytial Virus of Lymphosarcomatous and Apparently Normal Cattle. Can
Res 1969; 29:188-93.

15. Dermott E. Clark JK. Samuels J. et al. The Morphogenesis and Classification of Bovine Syncytial Virus. J Gen Vir 1971, 12:105-19.

16. Parks WP. Todaro GJ. Biological Properties of Syncytium-Forming ('Foamy'): Viruses. Virology 1972; 47:673-83.

17. Gallagher RE. Gallo RC. Type C RNA Tumor Virus Isolated from Cultured Human Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Cells. Science 1975; 187:350-3. (Note designation of patient as HL-23.)

18. Van der Matten MJ. Miller JM. Serological Evidence of Transmission of Bovine Leukemia Virus to Chimpanzees'. Vet Micro 1976; 1:1351-7.

19. Miller JM. Miller LD. Olson C. Gillette KG. Virus-Like Particles in Phytohemagglutinin-Stimulated Lymphocyte Cultures With Reference to Bovine Lymphosarcoma. JNCI 1969; 43:1297-305.

20. Burny A. Bruck C.. Chantrenne H. et al. Bovine Leukemia Virus: Molecular Biology and Epidemiology. In: Viral Oncology Ed. Klein G. 1980 Raven Press. (See particularly page 232, Table 1; Note BLV and BSV disease characteristics in cows which are duplicated in humans for
HTLV-I and HTLV-II.)

21, Sodroske J. Rosen C. Wong-Stall F. et al. Trans-Acting  Transciptional Regulation of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type III Long Terminal Repeat. Science 1985, 1227:171-3.

22. Corneo G. Nelli LC. Medica II CdP. et al. Could Bovine Leukemia
Virus Be a Possible Agent of Some Human Lymphatic Leukemias. Acta Haemat 1984; 72:65-6.

23. Biggar RJ. Melbye M. Sarin PS. et al. ELISA HTLV Retrovirus Antibody Reactivity Associated with Malaria and immune Complexes in Healthy Africans. Lancet; ii:520-3.(Sept- 7, 1985).

24. Gallo RC. Essex ME. Gross L. Ed. Human T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Virus. 1984; Cold Springs Harbor Press.

25. Blattner WA. Gallo RC. Epidemiology of Human Retroviruses. Leuk Res 1985; 9:697-8. (Note that a tool is man-made instrument for work.)

26. Hino S. Yamaguchi K. Katamine S. et al. Mother-to-Child Transmission of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type-I. Jpn J Can Res (Gann)- 1985: 76:474-80.

27. Leibowitch, J. A Strange Virus of Unknown Origin. trans. Howard R. (UN VIRUS ETRANGE VENU D'AILLEURS. Grasset et Fasquelle 1984) New York: Ballentine Books 1985:97.

28. Ferrer JF. Stock ND. Lin P. Detection of Replicating C-Type Virus in Continous Cell Cultures Established From cows with-Leukemia: Effect of the Culture Medium. JNCI 1971; 47:613-621.

29. McClure HM. Keeling ME. Custer RP. Marshak RR. Abt DA. Ferrer JF. Esytholeukemia in Two-Infant Chimpanzees Fed Milk from Cows Naturally Infected with the Bovine C-Type Virus. Can Res 1974; 34:2745-57. (This is just a brand of AIDS in chimps!)  

30. Bennett RK. The Broken Promise of the United Nations. Reader's Digest 1983; October: 117-124.

31. Francis DP. Hadler SC. Thompson SE. et al. The Prevention of Hepatitus B with Vaccine. Annls Int Med 1982; 97:362-6.

32. Wong-Stall F. Gallo RC. Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses. Nature 1985; 317;395-403. (Compare the map on 396 to map on page 681 of reference No. 8.)  

33. Wong-Stall F. Gallo RC. The Family of Human T-Lymphotropic Leukemia Viruses: HTLV-I as the Cause of Adult T-Cell Leukemia and HTLV-III as the Cause of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Blood 1985; 65:25363. (No. 2 Feb.) (Compare the map on page 254 to map in reference No. 8.).

34. Moseley B. Interview of D. Carlton Gajdusek. OMNI 1986; March: 62 et al.,at page 106 

35. Slaff JI. Brubaker JK. The Aids Epidemic. How You Can Protect Yourself and Your Family-Why You Must-." 1985; Warner Books Edition.

36. Guyton JR. Rosenberg RD. Clowes AW. Karnovsky MJ. Inhibition of Rat Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation by Heparin. Cir Res 1980; 46:625-633 (No. 5 May) Muller WEG. Zahn RK. Seidel HJ. Inhibitors acting on Nucleic Acid Synthesis in an Oncogenic RNA Virus. Nature New Biology 1971; 232:143-5. (August 4)

37. Torrence PF. Biological response Modifiers: New Approaches to Disease Intervention. 1985: New York: Academic Press, Inc. Harcourt Brace Javanovich.  

38.Klatzmann D. Barre-Sinoussi F. Nugeyre MT. et al. Selective Tropism of Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus (LAV) for Helper-Inducer T Lymphocytes; Science 1984; 225:59-63. 

39. Chiu I. Callahan R. Tronick SR. et al. Major 221 Gene Progenitors in-the Evolution of Oncoviruses. Science 1985; 223:364-70.

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS

4200 PINE ST
PHILADELPHIA PA 19104 05AM

03/05/86 TWX ESL62838895-L8AC

THEODORE A STRECKER
PREFERRED RISK PARTNERS INC
334 NORTH CENTRAL. AVENUE.
SUITE 101
GLENDALE CA 91203

REF, FILE 3, 2l, 3, HAVE RECEIVED YOUR 26, FEBRUARY LETTER, IT APPEARS TO BE ENTIRELY CONCERNED WITH MATTER OF VIROLOGY DISCUSSED IN LANCET BY BIGGAR AND IN OTHER SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS BUT NOT IN ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, BELIEVE THAT APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR YOU WOULD BE TO SEND YOUR LETTER TO LANCET.

EDWARD HUTH MD. EDITOR, ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE,
4200 PINE STREET,
PHILADELPHIA, PA 194104-4098

16:20 EST

MGMCOMP

IGNORANCE IS BLISS OR IS IT SUICIDE?

We all know it is easier for a king to have a lie believed than a beggar to spread the truth. Well, we are spreading the truth about AIDS. Unfortunately, it isn't pretty. But the fact is you are not being told the truth by the government or the so-called AIDS experts. The media, for reasons of their own, will not present information contradicting the official propaganda. So you can choose to go along with the same people who gave us brain cancer (SV- 40) virus) as a result of their contaminated polio vaccines in the early 1960's; a polio-like disease from their contaminated Swine Flu vaccine in the 1970's; and AIDS from their smallpox and hepatitis B vaccines; or, you can at least make yourself aware of the clear and present dangers that we all face by watching "The Strecker Memorandum." The cost of the DVD is nominal, but we submit that remaining ignorant can cost infinitely more.

Get a copy of this powerful video on DVD and share it with your friends.

HOME